Diane Ravitch posted a few days ago about an email that went out to some Floridians from StudentsFirst, Michelle Rhee's reformyist lobbying group. The email offered people a chance to win a restaurant gift card if they posted reformy comments at various websites about education news stories. As
Parents Across America describes it:
Michelle Rhee’s StudentsFirst is well known for its deceptive tactics of posting seemingly harmless petitions calling to an end to student bullying, for example, or opposing firing good teachers, and then claiming all the people who unknowing sign them as one of their members. Even well-informed PAA members, completely opposed to the goals of this astroturf group, have been caught in her trap.
When Ravitch and
Bob Sikes (he's kind of like a Florida version of me) published the email, the author, Catherine Durkin Robinson, did what reformyists do best: she threw a hissy fit for anyone daring to point out what she was really up to. Her response is the second comment on Sikes's post:
My record is clear.
As a 25-year veteran of campaigns to end apartheid, support animal rights, protect a woman’s right to choose, bring recycling to college campuses, champion the rights of the LGBT community…
As an 8-year teacher of at-risk youth and ESE students…
As a canvasser for Dukakis, Clinton, Gore, Kerry, and Obama in rural Pasco and Polk counties…
As a concerned mom and PTA officer…
…nothing prepared me for the level of nastiness and vitriol that descended upon me when I took this job and began to vocally advocate for policies that put students first.
But nothing will deter me or scare me away. Because last week I spoke with a mom who’s only hope of putting her son in a good school is to break the law and pretend to live in another district. I’ll keep fighting against powerful union and school board interests. I’ll keep fighting…to help her.
And shame on the rest of you.
Don't you just love how these people think their crusade to gut teacher workplace protections, de-unionize the profession,
implement merit pay schemes that they run away from when they don't work, and upend democracy through
parent "tricker" nonsense...
... a crusade paid for by corporate education privatizers and oligarchs (keep reading)...
... a crusade run by people like Rhee who got
mediocre results by their own standards when they were educators themselves (and those
standards are suspect to begin with) ...
... don't you just
love how, when criticized, these people immediately shield themselves by lumping in their activities with anti-arparthied activists and GLBT rights advocates? They
literally draw comparisons between themselves and Nelson Mandela; as if getting Rupert Murdoch's money to run around the country and
buy fund state legislature races is the slightest bit equivalent to sitting in a South African jail for 27 years.
But I digress.
Ravitch herself, one of Rhee's biggest critics,
fell for the StudentsFirst trap and is counted as one of their "members." Which brings up a point made by blogger
GATORBONBC:
Ms. Robinson,
You write: “And so now I’m organizing over 119,000 Florida parents, teachers and concerned citizens.” … I politely ask you to verify those numbers.
Why do I not believe that 119,000 people in Florida agree with you? Let me politely explain.
I am also an advocate. I also interact/organize tens of thousands of parents. I have yet to ever meet one that agrees with Students First’s ‘transformative’ reform. So, I am politely interested as to where you get the number “119,000″. [emphasis mine]
It's a very good question, because Rhee and StudentsFirst have always made a very big deal about how many "members" they have; it's how they give themselves credibility.
When SF reached the one million "member" mark, they
made sure to crow about it. In what I am sure is nothing but a happy coincidence, that one-millionth member happened to be an anti-tenure teacher. All she had to do was give her
email address and zip code, and she was in. Unlike, say,
the NRA, which requires a $35 fee. On that basis alone, would anyone say the number of the NRA's members should be compared to the number of SF's "members"?
But that's not the only way SF recruits it's "members."
Change.org said they dropped the group after it's anti-union rhetoric rubbed enough progressives the wrong way; problem is, as of this past month,
SF appeared to still be at it:
From a reader:
Change.org & Students First are STILL at it! Yet ANOTHER Students First petition is attached to a valid one. This petition is titled
“Good Teachers Deserve Decent Pay.” REALLY?? Can someone out there get them to stop loading these phony petitions? It
says that 1,300,000+ people signed!!! To whoever can do anything–THANK YOU VERY MUCH!
Note: I am still a “member” of StudentsFirst, having signed a petition without knowing that I was joining an organization that I did not wish to join.
I assume that a significant portion of the alleged 1.3 million “members” are like me. I’m guessing that over one million of her supposed members are like me: Duped into joining.
Don’t count anyone as a member who has not knowingly signed up. [emphasis mine]
So signing an on-line petition to raise teacher pay makes you a "member" of SF? To become a member of the NEA, you have to be a current or retired teacher and pay dues. Are these 1.3 million people SF claims as "members' at all like the
3.2 million NEA members?
Rhee First cited an article in Ed Week that asked similar questions:
Written by Stephen Sawchuk for EdWeek. Read the
entire article here.
“
StudentsFirst… claims to have 1.3 million members, each of whom has donated an average of $40. Individuals can become members through several channels, including by signing up at a live event; through outreach drives at college campuses; signing up on its website; signing the organization’s pledge; or signing one of its petitions hosted on outside websites.In the latter instance, some critics contend that StudentsFirst’s petitions are designed to capture as many members as possible, thus inflating the totals.
Ric Brown, a professor in the New York City-based Pratt Institute’s department of social sciences and cultural studies, said that while signing an unrelated petition on the change.org website, the site presented him with a petition supporting higher pay for teachers, which he also signed. Only on closer inspection, he said, did he see that the petition was sponsored by StudentsFirst, whose policy goals he eschews.
“It was very deceptive,” Mr. Brown said. “It would be very easy to collect a lot of members this way.”
StudentsFirst officials dispute such accounts, saying that its petitions are clearly marked and that signatories can opt out of membership before signing, or cancel it afterwards.
Impressive membership numbers aside, some of the advocacy groups’ grassroots efforts have been disputed. For example, StudentsFirst officials say that its members sent nearly 200,000 messages to the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee shortly after committee leaders deleted mandatory teacher evaluations from a draft bill to renew the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. But a committee official said, ‘We did not receive anywhere close to that number of emails.’“ [emphasis mine]
And there's more: SF's partner in New Jersey,
B4K, handed out backpacks to students last fall. To get a backpack, however, parents had to leave their names, addresses, and other information. Did those people become "members" as well? No one's saying.
Why does this matter? Well, over and over again, Rhee and her staff use their claims about the number of SF's "members" to demonstrate a groundswell of support for their group. But SF
is largely funded by billionaires like hedge-fund trader David Tepper, former Enron exec John Arnold, the very reformy Eli Broad, and,
according to Steven Brill, Rupert Murdoch - a man who
stands to make a lot of money if reformyness goes his way.
Rhee refuses to talk about how she is funded, but she constantly brings up her membership numbers. She harped on how SF in New York had 110,000 "members" when she was on
Brian Lehrer earlier this year to justify popular support for her positions. I wonder how many of these "members" would agree with the obnoxious, condescending, and,
to some, homophobic Olympics ad SF is running. I would ask if they liked the idea of their membership dues paying for it... except it appears that many of them may not have paid dues at all.
It's time to call StudentsFirst what it really is: an
astroturfing group. It pretends to be grassroots, but all indications are that any large popular support it claims is artificial.
Rather than throwing another hissy fit, SF would do much better to come clean once and for all and open up its books. How many of these "members" thought enough of SF's policies to donate at least $25 to the group?
Rhee has an outsized place in the debate on education, given her own mediocre performance as an educator. People have a right to know who bought her seat at the table, and who's paying for those gift cards: parents and teachers, or billionaires?
Hmm... I've got Appleby's, TGIF, Olive Garden, Red Lobster...
